RSS

Tag Archives: shady informants

CagePrisoners: What to do When Profiled and Harassed by Law Enforcement

At Cageprisoners we receive a number of calls each week complaining about the treatment that Muslims are receiving by various agencies. It is time to redress the balance by informing the public of their rights.

Since the start of the War on Terror, there has been consistent harassment of the Muslim community – and several non-Muslims too – by security agencies in the UK and abroad. There are many who will tell stories of how they were questioned by MI5, MI6, Special Branch and even the SAS while they were being tortured and mistreated by various security agencies abroad. Unfortunately in those circumstances, those people had absolutely no ability to exercise their rights in any way – for those who were complicit in their abuse, should have been the ones to protect them.

For those who were detained abroad, the fear of their situation was used by the security agencies in order to attempt to coerce them into working for the authorities. Those British citizens and residents who eventually ended up in Guantanamo Bay, at some point were offered work opportunities with the UK security agencies in order to save them from their situation – however they all chose to maintain their dignity by not allowing themselves to be subjected to such bribes.

In the UK, there are various forms of police and security harassment taking place against the Muslim community. Poor intelligence gathering and a system of profiling (which is actually stereotyping – treating all Muslims as if they are terrorist suspects) has resulted in the most serious breaches of human rights. We should never forget that when the police murdered Jean Charles de Menezes, they assumed they were killing a Muslim.

At Cageprisoners we receive a number of calls each week complaining about the treatment that Muslims are receiving by various agencies. It is time to redress the balance by informing the public of their rights. There is no reason why anyone should feel intimidated into cooperating with the security agencies beyond what the law requires, particularly when they attempt to use powers beyond what is acceptable.       Read the rest of this entry »

 
1 Comment

Posted by on May 8, 2012 in News Items

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The First Amendment: Muslims Need Not Apply

Hutaree Who?

It is a frightening scenario. Nine heavily armed men conduct military-style training in preparation for a terrorist attack involving the bombing of a funeral for the police officer they had killed three days earlier.

Over a two-year period, a paid FBI informant and FBI agent infiltrates their cell, discusses building bombs and getting explosives and tapes their conversations. By the time their homes are raided, they had amassed instructions and material for making bombs, night vision binoculars, machine guns, assault rifles, 148,000 rounds of ammunition, body armor, gas masks, tear gas, knifes and swords.

Before their trial started, one of their members took a plea bargain, admitting the group “advocated” and prepared for violence against local, state and federal law enforcement.  True, the government’s case was not helped when the informant who received $31,000 to infiltrate the group got arrested for shooting at his wife, but it still seemed like the case against the others would be a slam dunk – right?

Well, it almost certainly would have been if they were Muslims. It is difficult to imagine any judge extending the protection of the First Amendment to taped conversations between Muslims stating that they should “start hunting” law enforcement “pretty soon” and that “it is time to strike and take our nation back so that we may be free again from tyranny.”

But that is what a Michigan federal judge, Victoria Roberts, did on 27 March in the case involving seven members of the Hutaree militia of self-described “Christian warriors.” Throwing out the most serious charges against the four members of the Stone family and their associates, she declared that the case was “built largely of circumstantial evidence” and that the alleged plot to kill a local police officer and then attack his funeral procession is “utterly short on specifics.”

While the prosecution insisted “these individuals wanted a war,” Judge Roberts agreed with the defense attorney William Swor who said that the group’s leader, David Stone, “was exercising his God-given right to blow off steam and open his mouth.”

In the words of the judge, his “statements and exercises do not evince a concrete agreement to forcibly resist the authority of the United States government. His diatribes evince nothing more than his own hatred for – perhaps even desire to fight or kill – law enforcement; this is not the same as seditious conspiracy.

At a time when armed extremist anti-government groups may have as many as 100,000 adherents, Judge Roberts’ homage to the breadth of First Amendment protected speech may appear welcome to some and foolhardy to others. But there is no denying that it highlights the chasm between the prosecutions carried out against suspected Muslim terrorists, and the homegrown domestic brand that gave us Timothy McVeigh.
Read the rest of this entry »

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 20, 2012 in News Items

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Federal Terrorism Investigations Resemble Raunchy Reality TV

Here’s an indecent question: Under what conditions might a husband cheat on his wife?

Imagine if a major television network created a reality show designed to answer this question. Bringing together weeks of planning, heavy surveillance, psychological profiles of the target, and a cast of young, alluring undercover agents, the show would put unwitting husbands to the ultimate test of spousal loyalty.

After being conned for weeks, some of the men would likely capitulate and take that fateful step toward betrayal. With the hook set, the lights would flash on, a banner would drop from the ceiling revealing the deception, and the show’s host, Johnnie Cochran, would climb through a window to offer his legal services in the forthcoming divorce. Perhaps the show would air as a spinoff of MTV’s gotcha program “Punk’d.”

While this idea may seem farfetched, an analogous scheme is being cooked up and served on a regular basis by the FBI in its campaign against terrorism.

According to a recent study, since 9/11, the majority of criminal convictions in high-profile terror cases in the United States relied on sting operations and informants. In some of these cases, legal experts have raised concerns over whether the agents crossed the line into entrapment, using enticements to lure penniless men and sometimes teenagers into highly sophisticated plots they never could have handled (or even dreamed of) on their own.

Entrapment is a legal defense against criminal liability when it can be shown that the person would not have committed the crime but for the inducements of the government agents. The FBI argues that these sting operations do not amount to entrapment because the people they target are predisposed to commit the offenses given the opportunity.

Legal scholars have argued that the FBI gets away with tempting people into committing crimes because the courts focus more on the defendant’s subjective “disposition” than they do on the means of persuasion or inducements provided by agents.

One defendant in a recent case, Hemant Lakhani, agreed to sell missiles to an undercover FBI agent who was posing as a terrorist. When it became clear that Mr. Lakhani had no access to such weapons, another undercover agent sold him a fake version of the arms so that he could, in turn, make the illegal sale. During the transaction, incidentally, Lakhani appeared to test the weapon by placing it on his shoulder pointed in the wrong direction. His entrapment defense failed and he received a 47-year prison sentence.

In another sting operation, the defendant, James Cromitie, was a poor African-American who had allegedly converted to Islam in prison. He agreed to carry out an attack after being offered $250,000, other valuable enticements, and weapons by the FBI’s undercover informant. The judge on the case, Manhattan Federal Judge Colleen McMahon called the defendants “thugs for hire, pure and simple.” She described Mr. Cromitie as “incapable of committing an act of terrorism on his own,” saying a “zealous” government had “created acts of terrorism out of his fantasies…and then made those fantasies come true.

But before a jury, Cromitie’s entrapment defense, like all the others in the decade following 9/11, also failed. The ruling prompted legal experts to suggest that juries may be weighting these cases differently than other entrapment cases, given the dramatic events of 9/11 and the constant media spotlight on terrorism.

As in many of the previous cases, one of the FBI’s latest stings involved an isolated, impoverished young man. On Feb. 17, prompted by undercover officers posing as Al Qaeda members and offering the latest in high-yield explosives, Amine El Khalifi made his way to an attack site in Washington, D.C. before being swarmed by the authorities. If the previous pattern holds, he will now spend the rest of his life in prison.

Our point here is not to forgive Mr. Khalifi but rather to suggest that his behavior is not only a product of his personal disposition but also his social circumstances and the FBI’s sting operation in particular.

We recognize that the task of detecting and interrupting terrorist activities is difficult, dangerous, and at times requires sophisticated undercover operations to prevent atrocities from occurring. But the roots of terrorism – distrust, anger, and hatred – end up growing stronger in the environment the FBI is creating. Duping disgruntled citizens to act out criminally using means-justify-the-ends enticements in fact fosters the distrust and sense of injustice that breeds terrorism.

We want the US government to recognize what social scientists call “the power of the situation” to influence terrorist behavior and to stop contributing to creating it. To be frank, our hopes for this suggestion are not high. Most Americans are carrying too much emotional and historical baggage to summon even one word of situational understanding for a terrorist act.

But what about the would-be philanderers on the reality show? Without forgiving their behavior, wouldn’t most Americans at least acknowledge the extraordinary nature of the situation, and recognize that many of these cheaters would still be faithful husbands had it not been for the crafty, well-organized, sexually spectacular forces behind the deception?

If the answer is yes, a similar moral calculus must be used to evaluate the Khalifi case, the FBI’s role in creating this outcome, and the virtue of continuing these counterterrorism operations.

The success of an entrapment defense should not depend on the nature of the would-be crime, but on the nature of the FBI’s actions. Ruling in favor of a defendant like Khalifi may seem counterintuitive to any jurists wishing to protect Americans. But that’s exactly what these jurists should do if they wish to define and protect the civil liberties and freedoms that keep them safe.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 12, 2012 in News Items

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Brother Muhammad Hussain Sentenced to Twenty-Five Years For Part in FBI Plot

At a 7 January arraignment, Muhammad Hussain (Antonio Martinez) initially entered a plea of not guilty, only to change his plea a year later. In an agreement to face up to 25 years for attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction, the government agreed to waive charges of attempted murder of federal employees.

This past Friday, April 6, Hussain renounced any ties to terrorism and expressed regret for participating in an elaborate FBI-orchestrated ’terror plot’ wherein he was recruited by an FBI informant in 2010. While the vehicle bomb and ‘plot’, supplied by the FBI, were fake, the hefty charges and two-year-long ordeal he has undergone have been dramatically real.

The government lead ‘attack’, which was, paradoxically, simultaneously both a danger to the public, averted by the vigilant counter terrorism units, as well as a tightly controlled and choreographed charade, sought to target a Catonsville Military Recruitment Centre.

Muhammad was targeted for entrapment by US government agencies due to his online vocality and his use of Facebook, in particular, has been cited as the source of his government-goaded radicalisation. Such posts as one made in September of 2010: ‘the sword is cummin the reign of oppression is about 2 cease.’ have been said by the state to be a glorification of jihad and thus made him a prime target for FBI agent provocateurs.

Big Brother is indeed watching; federal agents regularly monitor social-networking sites and other webpages and otherwise benign internet activity for hints of ‘unrest’, making undercover contact with political dissidents and those critical of US foreign or domestic policy, and, increasingly, supplying the suspects with phony taxpayer-funded weaponry after months of state-sponsored radicalisation to carry out government-engineered plots.

In Muhammad’s case, an undercover agent passed himself off as an ‘Afghan brother’ and provided a dummy vehicle bomb that he was goaded into utilising after attempting to backout when he heard about an eerily similar situation which had occurred in Oregon. These patterns of FBI precipitated events are well documented and are often lacking in deviation from a standard elementary pattern.

Muhammad is among a handful of Maryland residents accused of using the Internet to develop and spread violent beliefs, offer terrorist services and recruit like-minded volunteers for so-called jihad. This is despite the fact that it is, in fact government employed individuals, often criminal informants, that sought out the suspects and in some cases, despite the fact that no actual crimes, sans solicitation by paid provocateurs, have or had actually occurred.

In other cases, a former Army private from Laurel was federally charged this year with attempting to aid a foreign terrorist organization after a website supposedly drew him to radical Islam. And an Ellicott City teen is due at a Philadelphia federal court this month for a change-of-plea hearing related to allegations that he conspired to help terrorists. The boy, Mohammad Hassan Khalid, is accused of raising money online to fund jihad in South Asia and Europe; he previously pleaded not guilty.

In court Friday, Martinez’s attorney, Deputy Federal Public Defender Joseph A. Balter, suggested that the bomb plot could have been avoided if agents had counseled Martinez against it, rather than encouraging him during the investigation. Balter previously argued that the FBI entrapped his client, but Muhammad agreed to drop those claims during his plea hearing this winter.

U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz said it was ‘not the job of the FBI or law enforcement authorities to try and lead moderation. That’s the responsibility of the rest of us, including the Muslim community.’  A judgement which strangely implies that it is in fact the duty of the FBI and law enforcement to incite individuals to acts of violence, provide them with weapons, training (spiritual, ideological or logistical) in the course of ‘investigations’ that read more like well-rehearsed seductions and state-sponsored indoctrination programs.

Balter said at the hearing that Muhammad was raised with a strong religious background but struggled with his conscience and discipline as an adolescent, experimenting with alcohol, drugs and meaningless relationships. He attended Laurel High School but never graduated and was convicted of a 2008 theft in Montgomery County. He was also charged with armed robbery there in 2006, though the outcome of that case isn’t clear.

When Martinez found Islam, it helped him stop many destructive behaviors, Balter said. On his Facebook account, Martinez described himself as ‘just a yung brotha from the wrong side of the tracks who embraced Islam.

In the summer of 2010, he married a young college student, according to posts on the social networking site. Soon afterward, he appears to have developed more radical views of Islam, which his wife did not seem to support.

In jail, Martinez reflected on his choices and came to understand they were misguided and “simply wrong,” Balter said.

He absolutely shudders at the thought of what could have happened, the defense team has frankly been moved by what we have seen, the progress of Mr. Hussain.

Martinez also spoke during the hearing, with more than a half-dozen family members and friends looking on. He began by praising Allah, then took responsibility for the attempted attack, saying he believed it was the right thing to do to protect his religion.

He expressed love for humanity and professed a new way of thinking that refuted his old, violent views.

‘I believed it was the right thing to do to protect my religion, but the reality of the situation, is that it was not, and this is something I now know. I sincerely apologize for my treacherous actions and behavior, We should not confuse the methodology of al-Qaida for the perfect way of life that is Islam… I renounce [the misguidance] of terrorism.’

Further adding that he was grateful no one was hurt, he also denounced violent groups such as al-Qaida as “in fact, not jihad.“ He called the “real Islam” a “mission of peace” and a religion that no one in the courtroom should be afraid of.

Judge Motz reminded Martinez of the “power of words” and urged him to use his to “teach others that terrorism and jihad is not that way. The fact that we are a tolerant people does not mean that we are a weak people. … We will take what action we deem appropriate to protect ourselves” Motz warned. “I hope what you have come to realize remains true in your life.”

Muhammad hugged Balter and appeared at peace after the hearing, a big smile on his face.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on April 7, 2012 in News Items

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Mufid Abdulqader: March 15, 2012 (General View of the Special “I” CMU Unit at USP Marion)

This is an isolated Unit from the rest of the prison at USP Marion. Other parts of the prison have a section that has a prison camp and another that is medium security. Unlike other inmates in the Bureau of Prisons, all CMU inmates are not allowed any form of physical contact with their family members, children, wives or loved ones. Inmates are not allowed a brief hug upon greeting or saying goodbye. Inmates are only allowed to talk to their loved ones, children and wives through a thick glass window with a phone hook up that is monitored and recorded by a live person sitting in the next room while another person is watching you as well.

Even though no physical contact is allowed in the visit, yet inmates of the CMU MUST go through a comprehensive body search before the visit AND after the visit they MUST go through strip search (meaning you get totally naked, take off everything and you are searched thoroughly) after the visit.

The ban on physical contact during the visit violates the BOP’s own policy that stresses the importance of family visits as a way to rehabilitate inmates and prepare them to enter normal civilian life after serving their sentences. The CMU’s visitation regulations are even more strict than the rules applied to the Super Max prison ADX in Florence Colorado. These CMU units were created in secrecy since their establishments. They were created without public knowledge and without public comments as required by law.

Inmates who are designated to the CMU are not given a reason and without any way of due process which is a violation and abuse of power and racial and religious profiling. The CMU were created to isolate and separate certain inmates from the general populations in the BOP system. Based on statistics at Marion CMU, over 72% of inmates are Muslims which is 1200% higher than the national average of Muslims inmates in the BOP system. The majority of inmates here are Muslims. They are a collection from several Muslims countries as well as Naturalized U.S. Citizens originally from Muslim countries who has lived in the USA for many years.
Read the rest of this entry »

 
 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Las Víctimas de la Inquisición estadounidense

The following testimony, entitled “Victims of the American Inquisition” written by Zachary Chesser, is a microcosmic documentation of America’s naked and larger aggression against the religion of Islam in what Chesser terms the ‘American Inquisition.’ Since the intensification of this most recent inquisition, the global Muslim community has suffered a ruthless assault on legal rights and basic humanity, which in various arenas have been superficially designated as everything from geopolitical interests to heretical rhetoric. What Chesser exposes through details regarding his case and subsequent incarceration, is a pattern of federally sanctioned religious persecution and corrosive civil rights violations reflective of American foreign policy, shockingly common in so-called terrorism cases. He recounts how his religious beliefs designated him as a target for government surveillance, how this surveillance in turn became a means of distortion and manipulation, culminating in his incarceration and the deliberate alienation of his family, particularly the religiously charged, custodial kidnapping of his son.
_______________________________________________________________

En el nombre de Alá, el Compasivo, el Misericordioso:

Mi nombre es Abu Talha al-Zacarías Amriiki (legalmente “Zachary Adám Chesser “), y lo que sigue no es para tomarse a la ligera. Si se va a saber cuánto estas palabras pueden afectar a mí ya mi familia, entonces la gravedad de este mensaje no se puede escapar. Estoy escribiendo esto con el fin de que nadie debe caer en las mismas trampas y errores como yo, para establecer la prueba para los que dudan, y para rectificar los errores determinados. Tal vez mi ignorancia de la naturaleza de mi situación era una excusa para mí, pero si no, entonces le pido a Dios que me perdone. Sin embargo, después de mí, no creo que nadie va a tener una excusa en estos asuntos si estos eventos se manifiestan a ellos.

Esta es mi historia, y dentro de ella son fragmentos de las historias de muchos otros. Es sólo una relación de lo que yo sé que es verdad a lo mejor de mi capacidad, y estoy seguro de que lo que permanece oculto para mí es mucho peor que la que se hizo claro para mí, pero lo que sí está claro es suficiente para un persona de comprensión. Por lo tanto, que estas páginas se registran en los anales de la historia en los capítulos reservados a la Inquisición estadounidense.

En cuanto a lo que sigue …  Read the rest of this entry »

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Victims of the American Inquisition

The following testimony, entitled “Victims of the American Inquisition” written by Zachary Chesser, is a microcosmic documentation of America’s naked and larger aggression against the religion of Islam in what Chesser terms the ‘American Inquisition.’ Since the intensification of this most recent inquisition, the global Muslim community has suffered a ruthless assault on legal rights and basic humanity, which in various arenas have been superficially designated as everything from geopolitical interests to heretical rhetoric. What Chesser exposes through details regarding his case and subsequent incarceration, is a pattern of federally sanctioned religious persecution and corrosive civil rights violations reflective of American foreign policy, shockingly common in so-called terrorism cases. He recounts how his religious beliefs designated him as a target for government surveillance, how this surveillance in turn became a means of distortion and manipulation, culminating in his incarceration and the deliberate alienation of his family, particularly the religiously charged, custodial kidnapping of his son.
_______________________________________________________________

In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful:

My name is Abu Talhah Zakariyya al-Amriiki (legally “Zachary Adam Chesser”), and what follows is not to be taken lightly. If you were to know how much these words can affect me and my family, then the gravity of this message would not escape you. I am writing this in order that nobody should fall into the same traps and mistakes as I did, to establish proof for those who doubt, and to rectify certain wrongs. Perhaps my ignorance of the nature of my situation was an excuse for me, but if not, then I ask Allah to forgive me. However, after me, I do not think that anyone will have an excuse in these matters if these events are manifested unto them.

This is my story, and within it are pieces of the stories of many others. It is only a relation of what I know to be true to the best of my ability, and I am sure that what remains hidden from me is far worse than that which was made clear to me, but that which is clear is enough for a person of understanding. Therefore, let these pages be recorded in the annals of history under the chapters reserved for the American Inquisition.

As for what follows…  Read the rest of this entry »

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Shkumbin Sherifi and Nevine Aly Elshiekh’s Payment of Legal Fees Allegedly to Decapitate FBI Informants

A pair of FBI informants, a woman posing as a hitman’s assistant, and a convict collected money from the accused to allegedly assassinate three FBI informants who testified at the ‘NC7′ trial last year.

Twenty-one year old Shkumbin Sherifi is the younger brother of twenty-seven year old Hysen Sherifi, the Kosovar-Albanian sentenced earlier this year to 45 years in prison for a terror related conviction in North Carolina.

Fourty-six year old Nevine Aly Elshiekh, a teacher for developmentally delayed children, has headed the special education program at Sterling Montessori Academy and Charter School in Morrisville for nine years.

Shkumbin Sherifi

Young and openly critical of the government’s persecution of Muslims, Shkumbin was outspoken about the innocence of his brother and actively campaigned for his release in politically and religiously charged demonstrations and music.

Muslims after the September 11 attacks were targeted,” Shkumbin Sherifi said in a video uploaded to YouTube the day of his arrest. “For Muslims, it’s guilty until proven innocent.

He also recorded rap songs in English and Albanian under the stage name Beme. His lyrics recount the sectarian violence in his homeland, after which tens of thousands of Albanian Kosovars, including the Sherifis, ended up as refugees in the United States, Germany and other western nations:

Bombs dropping four in the morning, tanks blowing, windows shaking, my momma’s fainting,” Shkumbin Sherifi raps to a heavy beat. “I was a kid. Hey, what could I do? … Guerrilla warfare, yeah, we fight back. But NATO don’t like that. We fight for each other.“ Like many other artists Shkumbin used the medium of hip-hop and rap to explore and express himself regarding both his personal experiences as well as societal events. Hyperbole and fictionalised events are often used in the medium as Shkumbin, himself mentions in regards to the rapper Eminem, who had several songs about murdering his wife despite it being understood simply as an artist expressing themselves through their work.

State court records show his only prior brush with the law was in 2006 while still a teenager, when he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge for resisting a public officer. Relatives have declined repeated interview requests. However, an older sister, Hylja Sherifi, testified at a 27 January court hearing that Shkumbin is the  primary caregiver to their father, who has terminal lung cancer.

Nevine Aly Elshiekh

Nevine Elshiekh, a family friend of one of the defendants, frequently made the two-hour trip to New Bern to attend the monthlong trial, which began shortly after the 10th anniversary of the 11 September attacks. She meticulously documented the testimony and was a part of the active Muslim community that showed their solidarity and support for the entrapped trio.

I think Islam has been on trial,” commented Elshiekh after the sentences were read out. The college educated dog-lover is well-respected by her neighbors and has never had even a speeding ticket, much less a criminal history.

Family members and friends find it impossible to reconcile that caring woman with the zealot federal prosecutors claim hired a hitman. Her father, an Egyptian who moved his family to the U.S. more than fourty years ago, told The Associated Press the charges don’t add up.

We don’t believe it,” said Aly Elshiekh, 80, a retired professor at North Carolina State University. “She loves special-ed kids and has dedicated her life to helping kids with disabilities.” Her father, a U.S. citizen since 1974, said he trusts the U.S. justice system. ”She will be treated fairly,” Aly Elshiekh said.

She has also served as a teacher at a religious school that is part of the Islamic Association of Raleigh, the city’s largest mosque. Imran Aukhil, a spokesman for the mosque, did not respond to requests for comment. Members of the congregation were among about thirty people who attended court hearings in Wilmington to show support.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 13, 2012 in News Items

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Playing Tricks with the Fort Dix Six: The Pretrial Penning of a Felon in Philly

Now you see why we were going to sacrifice all for the sake of allah in jihad,” says the neatly handwritten note on prison-issue paper.We weren’t able to finish.”

Left: The fake letter, Right: A real letter by Eljvir Duka

Those seemingly incriminating words are part of a letter the U.S. Attorney’s office in New Jersey says one of the defendants in the “Fort Dix Six” homegrown terror case wrote to a fellow inmate at the Federal Detention Center (FDC) in Philadelphia. It was allegedly written by Eljvir Duka, who is charged with conspiring to attack the Fort Dix military base with automatic weapons. He and four other young Muslim men who grew up in the South Jersey area have all pleaded not guilty, and the trial is set for March. The jihad letter appears, at first glance, to be a damning piece of evidence against Duka.

But a TIME investigation of the Fort Dix Six shows that little in this case is as it first appears. While carefully assembled by authorities, who collected hundreds of hours of video and audio evidence, the case is built almost entirely on the work of a paid informant with a criminal record. More and more terrorism cases are being constructed this way, and the problematic role of informants doesn’t stop after the arrests are made, as this latest plot twist reveals.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 13, 2012 in Flashback, News Items

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Ulugbek Kodirov Pleads Guilty to Avoid Life Sentence

A Muslim from Uzbekistan who pleaded guilty Friday to plotting to kill President Barack Obama with an automatic rifle claimed he was acting at the direction of an Islamic terror group in his home country, according to the plea agreement filed in court Friday.

Authorities said Ulugbek Kodirov (Улугбек Кодиров) had discussed trying to kill the president as he campaigned for re-election because he would be out in public more often. Kodirov entered the plea during a hearing in Birmingham before U.S. District Judge Abdul K. Kallon, an Obama appointee.

Defense attorney Lance Bell said the twenty-two-year-old Kodirov avoided a potential life sentence by pleading guilty. He faces up to 30 years in prison, though Bell expected Kodirov to receive about half that. The judge also told Kodirov that, despite Uzbekistan’s appalling human rights record, he will face deportation once he’s released from prison. Read the rest of this entry »

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 11, 2012 in News Items

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 272 other followers